Two of three agree — investigate without inventing a match. · ~35 min
Partial match: two of three fields agree (ref/amount/date). Investigate; do not invent a full match.
Amount mismatches (tax, short-pay, FX) are their own bucket — not exact matches.
Pair clear exact matches. For partials (2 of 3), still pair them but you will tag disposition in the next step mentally: leave true traps unmatched.
Click a statement line, then click an AP line to pair. Click a pair badge to unlink. Archetypes: S1 × L2.
Bellweather Hydraulics
44 Industrial Ave, Braeside VIC 3195
Statement date: 2026-04-12
Classify each scenario. Short-pays and tax differences are amount mismatches — not exact matches.
Select a card, then click a bucket. Timing and report-flavour mistakes that look like “missing” are critical fails.
Answer every question, then check. Pass bar is shown after submit.
1. Statement line INV-2099 ($400) has no obvious AP counterpart. Your AP has a line OTHER-99, also $400, dated one day apart — for a different vendor's invoice. What's the right call?
2. Same invoice number both sides. Statement shows $1,100 (GST-inclusive); your AP shows $1,000 (GST-exclusive). What's this?
3. You short-paid an invoice by $50 for damaged goods. The vendor's statement still shows it fully open. Reference and date otherwise agree. What's this?
4. Same amount and date both sides. Your AP shows INV-44; the vendor's statement shows CN-44 (a credit note). What's this?
StatementZen Academy Team — Built from StatementZen's own vendor statement reconciliation engineering and casework — pending Michael's named byline commitment (spec.md section 7). · Last updated