Find what is missing on the statement vs in the ERP — after ruling out timing. · ~40 min
On the statement but not in ERP → often a missing bill (or wrong vendor / wrong extract).
In ERP but not on the statement → dispute, vendor lag, or report-flavour / timing.
Match what you can. Two statement lines are missing from AP. Two AP lines are extras — classify carefully (one may be timing).
Click a statement line, then click an AP line to pair. Click a pair badge to unlink. Archetypes: S1 × L1.
Norwood Timber Supplies
8 Millwright St, Norwood SA 5067
Statement date: 2026-05-13
Read each scenario, click it, then click the correct bucket. Watch for the aged-open false alarm.
Select a card, then click a bucket. Timing and report-flavour mistakes that look like “missing” are critical fails.
Classify each scenario. DUP_CAND has two subtypes: caught before either entry is paid (freeze and void) vs. caught after both have been paid (recovery). Watch for lookalikes that are not actually duplicates.
Select a card, then click a bucket. Timing and report-flavour mistakes that look like “missing” are critical fails.
Rank ALL five actions from best (1) to worst (5). There is no single 'correct' answer to pick — every option must be weighed against the others, and the ranking is scored against an expert-consensus order, not a single best answer.
Consensus ranking: authored, provisional — not yet scored against a real multi-rater expert panel.
You're reconciling a vendor statement. One line on the statement — Invoice #INV-40218, $2,140.00 — has no matching line anywhere in the ledger export you pulled from the ERP. Before you do anything else, decide what order you'd tackle these five possible next actions in.
StatementZen Academy Team — Built from StatementZen's own vendor statement reconciliation engineering and casework — pending Michael's named byline commitment (spec.md section 7). · Last updated